Multi-cap funds face two paradoxes that introduce subtle hurdles into their fund analytics. While it is desirable for a fund to rely on a sound investment process and to follow that process consistently, a successful multi-cap fund might not be able to meet both desires simultaneously. Second, a successful multi-cap fund will always be compared to the highest performing peer group while unsuccessful funds will be compared to a less successful set of peer funds. Attentive fund analysts can overcome the challenges we have identified in this study, assuming they are cognizant of the unique issues facing multi-cap and mid-cap funds. This report is intended to arm analysts with just such insights to ensure that benchmark and peer group comparisons are meaningful and constructive.