Research.LeutholdGroup

Read this week's MTI update.

The latest CPI report was largely in line with consensus. Our scorecard shows the trend of disinflation has stalled.

Read this week's Major Trend.

The most notable gainer in last week’s Trump Bump 2.0 was the Russell 2000. That index’s weekly surge of +8.6% was its best since the wild pandemic gyrations of April 2020. Yet, this latest Trump-associated upswing fell short of the Russell 2000’s election-week return of +10.2% in 2016 when Trump was the clear underdog.

In October, we published a new election barometer using the DJIA to predict the winner. It failed! Interestingly, the last time this model did not correctly pick the winner was also a year in which the sitting president, who was eligible to run, declined to do so—in 1968.

We’d expect monthly jobs numbers to confirm a recession, not forecast one. This cycle, though, employment reports have been warning of a downturn for 2½ years. It would be easy to call them misfires, but red flags keep coming. If a soft landing was in store, the jobs numbers should have improved by now. 

Given the beginning of an easing cycle in September and the Trump Trade in October, the lack of steepening in the yield curve is intriguing. While tighter financial conditions are likely a challenge to the steepening move, policy regimes and the term premium are favorable toward further curve steepening.

Based on leading economic indicators, a case could be made for the Fed to cut rates again. Stocks are telling another story: Based on market momentum and valuation, an impending rate cut might be the least justified one in modern history.

Last year ended with an extremely rare nine-week winning streak, and the S&P 500 is still charting extraordinary upside momentum more than 10 months later. Historically, after a one-year stock surge of this magnitude (>35%), the U.S. has never declined into recession over the next 12 months.

Despite outperformance of value and small-cap stocks, actively-managed value and small-cap portfolios both struggled. No style box managed a clear win in favor of active management, which is unusual for such leadership conditions. There are several explanations that can account for this behavior.

Read this week's Major Trend. 

The S&P 500’s estimated bottom-up operating EPS shrank 2% during the first month of Q3 reporting (Chart 1). A similar, slightly larger drop in the EPS estimate was experienced in July, as results were tallied for Q2’s first month of reporting. That initial Q2 deficit was recouped over the next two months and actual results eventually ended higher than what was projected at the beginning of earnings season. To maintain this year’s strong earnings streak, where results match estimates (not common), we’ll need another “spring-back” scenario at the back end of Q3.

Read this week's Major Trend. 

It’s been awhile since readers have looked to The Leuthold Group for a rosier take on the stock market than what they can get from Wall Street. But there’s a time and place for everything.

Some were unnerved this week to hear the usually cheery strategist of a major U.S. investment bank predict S&P 500 total returns for the next decade of just +3% per year. While depressing, our work does not find that forecast out of line. We estimate that if S&P 500 5-Yr. Normalized EPS grow at their 1957-to-date annualized rate of +6.3% for the next ten years, and the P/E multiple on those future EPS were to revert to its median level for the same time period (19.4x versus today’s 31.6x), the S&P 500’s annualized total return out to late 2034 would be +2.6%.

The relative performance of small caps lags the S&P 500 by 75% since 2018, and we wondered why.  Was the Magnificent 7 effect so exaggerated that Info Tech and Communication Services, the sectors at the epicenter of the mega-cap growth boom, created such an overwhelmingly high hurdle that small caps were not able to keep pace with these powerhouse companies?  Alternatively, has small cap weakness been the product of sluggish results across multiple sectors, irrespective of the mega-cap growth issue, such that large caps were superior no matter which direction you looked? We label these two hypotheses as “deep” (relating specifically to the narrow but intense Mag 7 effect in Info Tech and Comm Services) or “wide” (describing failings across most small cap companies and industries) and designed this study to identify the most likely explanation.

Read this week's Major Trend.

We take a historical look at potential implications of the market’s strong upside momentum for both the stock market and the economy.

Read this week's Major Trend. 

The latest CPI report was a tad higher than consensus. Our scorecard shows the trend of disinflation stays intact.

Read this week's Major Trend. 

Due to a falloff in our sector rankings, exposure to IT in our equity portfolio has dropped sharply over the past year. Elevated valuations, combined with poor relative strength, overbought signals, and slowing growth are the primary impetus for the declining scores.

Market reaction to the latest flood of monetary and fiscal stimuli has been spectacular. While conviction about Beijing’s attempts to revive its flagging economy has been severely lacking, this time we should believe it. It’s certainly the right medicine China needs and the spark of confidence these actions will ignite should not be underestimated.

An economic downtown with little or no forewarning from stock prices is possible, but against the odds. Nonetheless, prior to 1950, there were three cases in which stock market gains failed to inoculate the economy against a recession. Today’s the stock market capitalization has become so large relative to the economy that stock price movements affect the outlook for growth and inflation more than ever before. 

Extreme stimulus announced by China had the desired effect of spiking the country’s stock market. The move did not trigger our EM Allocation Model; however, if the reversal is for real, there is plenty of time. The EM P/E multiple gap is so extreme that one wouldn’t miss out if they prefer to wait for more compelling confirmation than the fireworks of the last couple of weeks.

An excellent forecaster of election outcomes over the last 100 years is the stock market, itself. Measured over the three-month period through election day, if the S&P 500 has a gain, the incumbent party historically prevails; a negative return predicts a loss for the incumbent. This simple method has correctly identified the White House winner in 20 of the past 24 elections.

Small caps turned sour in August 2018, and since then, performance has been nothing less than disastrous. Is the enormous shortfall pervasive across small caps in general, or is it due to a top-heavy market with unusually huge returns from a few huge stocks? The answer may be helpful for those contemplating a contrarian position in this unloved corner of the market.

Read this week's Major Trend. 

Read this week's Major Trend. 

Traditionally defensive themes such as Staples and Utilities have outperformed over the summer months, reminding investors of the benefit of not going all-in on the AI growth theme. Quality is one of the most robust defensive factors, but even so has managed to outperform during the bull market run that began in October 2022.  While some Quality funds are designed to play defense, others seem more inclined to the offensive side of the field. We recommend that investors decide if they are targeting Quality specifically as a defensive exposure or as a core long-term holding to ensure they select the appropriate fund.

Read this week's Major Trend. 

August’s Core CPI was a tad hotter than expected, locking in a 25bps cut a week from today. Markets currently forecast 250bps of Fed easing by the end of 2025. We probably won’t see sub-2% inflation rates until the Spring of 2025.

Read this week's Major Trend.

2022-24 monetary tightening has been one of the most aggressive cycles in history, but other stimuli may have muted its impact. First, fiscal policy has been conspicuously looser than any prior period of tight money. Second is the stock-market wealth effect: U.S. equity market cap has leapt nearly $12T (~40% of GDP)—a larger wealth increase (versus GDP) than that of the entire 1982-1987 bull market.

The yield curve is back in the spotlight, as the yield spread between the 10-yr. Treasury and 2-yr. Note finally flipped positive on September 4th, after a record 26 months of inversion. While some economists claim this steepening implies a recession is now imminent, the historical record of such “un-inversions” is a mixed bag—in some cases the recession was still eight months- to over one-year away.

Bull markets that lacked a traditional recessionary “father figure” had shorter lives (33 mos. vs. 61 mos.) and produced gains just one-third the size (+63.6% vs. +186.9%). If today’s SPX bull matched the return of its four most-cyclically relevant predecessors, it would extend until May 2025, and top out at 5,852—8% above its September 6th close. (Not great.)

The economy normally fades heading into a series of rate cuts, with higher unemployment and lessening CPI inflation. Risky assets (stocks and credit) do well, and bond yields move lower. Real assets also benefit (gold in particular). On the whole, an easing cycle is favorable for most assets.

Read this week's MTI.

With Fed rate cuts likely to begin just days from now, the mathematical connection between changing rates and duration means that lower rates are almost certain to result in higher bond prices, an effect that has proven reliable since 2024’s high point in rates last April.  The simple approach of targeting longer durations is complicated by today’s inverted curve, meaning that lower rates will almost surely not manifest themselves through a parallel downward shift in the curve, but will be accompanied by an un-inversion that will return rates to an upward sloping shape.  This twist in the curve’s slope will require investors to target the appropriate spot on the curve to optimize the interest rate effect on bond prices.

Read this week's Major Trend. 

Read this week's Major Trend.