Research.LeutholdGroup

Read this week's Major Trend.

Read this week's Major Trend. 

The latest CPI report came in softer than consensus. The market ignored it. We expect a stagflationary scenario over the near term, but the longer term outlook has tilted materially toward a recession.

Read this week's MTI update

This cycle’s earnings performance has been exceptional. If EPS were to top out today, the peak-to-peak annualized performance from the last cycle high will have been the strongest among six cycles since the early 1970s. Nonetheless, nominal growth in EPS has been boosted by elevated inflation, which has supplied almost one-half of the last five years’ growth rate.

It’s worth considering that “this time” is not different. In fact, this time and may well be the same as it ever was, and the recent stock market collapse could morph into a perfectly normal cyclical bear market. Based on the average loss of the last 13 (non-recessionary) bear markets, SPX could drop to 4,153. 

The stock market declines of April 3rd and 4th were a mass liquidation with no distinguishing between Growth or Value. Still, there are signs that a rotation from the former to the latter is underway. And keep in mind that the most reliable catalyst for a transition in leadership is a bear market.

The risk is now extremely high that the breakdown in confidence will become self-fulfilling. The near 30-point collapse in Consumer Expectations from the post-election high could translate into a reduction in real-GDP growth of more than two percentage points over the next year.

The stock market losses in 2025 have materialized so rapidly that many investors might feel trapped, hoping for a bounce that provides better exit prices. The challenge may be that an imminent bounce and the “new narrative” to support it will seem so compelling that the urge to exit may dissipate.

March marked the second consecutive month of historically poor growth performance, capping the worst back-to-back stretch since the global financial crisis. While low volatility and value surged, growth and momentum were hit hard—raising big questions about how much downside remains and whether safety now comes at too steep a price.

Uncertainty surrounding Trump’s second term and the risk of escalating tariffs have shifted market focus from inflation to growth, raising fresh concerns about a potential recession. Our updated Recession Dashboard shows a delicate balance, with risk now slightly above 50%—driven largely by weakness in equities and full-time employment. While some indicators have improved, the market remains the most important signal to watch. A sharp selloff could tip the economy from slowdown into recession territory.

S&P 500 performance turned negative in the first quarter of 2025 and factor returns responded as expected. Defensive factors including Low Volatility and dividend-focused styles produced positive returns, and Value managed to eke out a tiny gain.

Read this week's Major Trend. 

With yesterday commemorating the 25th anniversary of the S&P 500 Y2K peak, it’s worth evaluating the long-term results of the unlucky purchases of U.S. equities occurring at that time. Of course, it’s doubtful that many investors decided to dump their money-market funds and go “all in” on stocks that day. Instead, think of this analysis as a review of how one’s dutiful, monthly 401(k) contribution for March 2000 has likely performed over the subsequent 25 years.

Read this week's Major Trend. 

This essay takes a broader view of Manias, Bubbles, Panics, and Crashes by expanding on these terms, considering the benefits of studying stock market bubbles, and looking for commonalities that mark each phase of a euphoric price cycle.  The most practical reason to study bubbles and crashes is the simple fact that they appear far more often than one might expect. Rational investors may be inclined to dismiss the periodic appearance of bubble conditions as just so much noise and frivolity, leaving us to focus on real world issues like the economy, profits, and expected returns. However, we believe the impact of manias and crashes on investment performance over an entire career is significant to the point of being decisive, and that is the most compelling reason to study the history of financial manias.

Read this week's Major Trend. 

February’s cool CPI figures were a welcome step down from January’s hot readings. Positive market reaction to the news was spotty. Trends that would suggest a cold economy and hot inflation are still in the early stages but uncertainty remains high.

Read this week's Major Trend. 

The median normalized P/E ratio for the S&P SmallCap 600 fell to 21.0x in February, the bottom quintile of all monthly observations since 1994. Historically, a normalized P/E multiple near the current level has been associated with a five-year-forward annualized return for small caps in the double digits.

For months, the euphemism to describe the weakening labor market has been “normalization.” Our preferred terminology has been “pre-recessionary,” and the numbers continue to trend in that direction.

Flip-flopping about tariffs has damaged confidence and at a time when the economic expansion already looks fragile. Back in 2017 and 2018, Trump Tariffs 1.0 occurred with an economy much better positioned to absorb the tariffs themselves, as well as the confusion surrounding them.

Despite volatile headlines, the German DAX index has staged a stellar double-digit rally since the start of the year—outpacing even the most “exceptional” S&P 500. In fact, over the last year or so, the DAX has now pulled ahead of the S&P 500.

The index’s income statement turned in one of its best showings of recent years. Year-over-year sales growth for S&P 500 companies landed at 5.6%, exceeding the 5.0% rate in nominal GDP and mimicking the sales growth posted earlier in the year. 

It was 25 years ago this month when the legendary dot-com mania reached its crescendo, entering market lore as one of the greatest bubbles in history. This silver anniversary prompted us to create a month-long series of articles under the banner of “Manias, Bubbles, Panics, And Crashes.” Here we look back at the sheer scale and intensity of the internet craze.

Read this week's Major Trend. 

The S&P 500’s bottom-up operating EPS continued to improve in the second month of reporting. Since the start of Q4 announcements, the EPS figure has increased 1%. The direction of the estimate, not necessary the amount, is what’s impressive. The same can’t be said for the coming two quarters, however. Bottom-up projections for Q1-25 have fallen 4% in the last two months, while Q2-25 is off 2%. Again, sharp moves higher in the EPS snail trails are exceedingly rare. With almost all of the reporting done for 2024, the S&P 500’s operating EPS of $234 equates to a healthy YOY gain of 9.5%. The expectation for full-year 2025 currently stands at +14.3%.

Read this week's Major Trend. 

Defined Outcome and Derivative Income ETFs each offer attractive features in the form of modified payout or income characteristics. However, these benefits come at a cost of limited upside, and a “buyer beware” approach should be taken to weighing their pros and cons. Sustained bull markets reveal the true impact of trading potential upside for considerable benefits in the here and now. This study attempts to quantify the opportunity costs of capped funds using 2023-24 as a particularly harsh test case.

Read this week's Major Trend. 

The latest CPI report came in a tad hotter than consensus. Policies are likely the key driver of economic outcomes, including inflation, and we should get ready for more volatility going forward.

We believe stock market leadership will transition from Growth to Value in 2025. The P/E premium commanded by Growth stocks relative to Value is high, although not (yet?) quite as extreme as at the Y2K Technology bubble peak.

When the S&P 500 made all-time highs the week of Thanksgiving and the following week, we viewed it as “risky, but not toppy.” Today, it is every bit as risky, but now looks toppy, too. There’s enough “wrong” with the picture that if the market immediately began to fall apart, the technical crowd would be able to cry, “It was obvious!”

Broad investor interest has validated the attractiveness of buffer and covered call funds. An important part of understanding these ETFs is having a solid grasp of the upside participation that is sold away. The last two years provided a perfect environment to empirically measure the give-up associated with selling calls.

There were two new group positions this month: Internet Services & Infrastructure and Hotels & Leisure. Trading Companies & Distributors was sold.

After an initial post-election surge, hopes of a small-cap Trump bump seem to be fading. Since election day through the end of January, the Equal Weighted S&P 500 (+1.9%) has essentially matched the S&P 600 (+2.1%).

Bond market reactions are consistent with the historical norm, so far, and suggest that a reversal of the current bear steepening is more likely than not.

The year 2024 will go down as one of the most hostile environments for active investors in the last 30 years. Style, size, and absolute market returns all have an impact on the relative performance of active versus passive portfolios; the fourth quarter continued a trend that has been in place for over two years.

Read this week's Major Trend.

It depends on who you ask. Non-equity investors might think the Trump trades are playing out just like in 2016. Over the last few months, FX traders and bond investors could have followed the 2016 script and made out like bandits (Charts 1 & 2). However, at this juncture, it might be time to at least take some chips off the table—if the 2016 analog stays intact, both the U.S. dollar and interest rates are poised to change course over the next few months. Near-term knee-jerk reactions aside (stronger dollar, lower yields), the newly announced tariffs will likely impact growth more than anything else, which would make it hard to sustain a stronger dollar and higher rates.